Western · sign 11 of 12 · natural 11th house
Aquarius
19 January – 18 February, 2025
Not one claim about Aquarius in this corpus is attested both in antiquity and today. Everything said about this sign now arrived after 1899 — and some of what the old books did say about it was dropped. This page separates the two.
When Aquarius actually begins
Computed from the Sun’s true ecliptic longitude for this year, not read from a fixed table. If you were born within a day of either boundary, a site using a table may put you in a different sign — and it is the table that is wrong.
What survives from antiquity
Nothing. This sign has no character claim attested in both antiquity and the present, so this page cannot open with “tradition holds” at all.
no claim attested in both antiquity and the presentWhat arrived with the popularisers
Claims that reach us through Alan Leo, Raphael and Sepharial — the Edwardian writers who turned astrology into a mass-market genre — with no ancient source behind them. These are usually the most familiar things said about Aquarius, and the page reference for each is below it.
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), How to Judge a Nativity, essay, p.21-23 — "most characteristic feature of Aquarius is its love of human nature" · Jaime McLeod, Farmers' Almanac · Cafe Astrology · Horoscope.com editorial staff · ZodiacSign.com · and 2 more
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.37-39 · Jaime McLeod, Farmers' Almanac · Cafe Astrology · Horoscope.com editorial staff · ZodiacSign.com · and 2 more
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), HTJN, p.88 · Cafe Astrology · The AstroTwins (Astrostyle) · ZodiacSign.com · Jaime McLeod, Farmers' Almanac · and 1 more
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.37-39 · Horoscope.com editorial staff · ZodiacSign.com · Acharya Rajesh Gupta, DuAstro · Wikipedia contributors
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), HTJN, p.88 · Nina Kahn, Bustle · ZodiacSign.com · Vance Lim, Aurae Astrology · Horoscope.com editorial staff · and 1 more
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.37-39 · The AstroTwins (Astrostyle) · Nina Kahn, Bustle
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.37-39 · Jaime McLeod, Farmers' Almanac · Acharya Rajesh Gupta, DuAstro
Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), Astrology for All, p.37-39 · Jaime McLeod, Farmers' Almanac · Acharya Rajesh Gupta, DuAstro
What the tradition said and we stopped saying
Attested in antiquity, and repeated by no contemporary source in this corpus.
Marcus Manilius (trans. Thomas Creech, 1697), Astronomica IV.20 (Creech, 'Of Aquarius') · Julius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.16.2
Marcus Manilius (trans. Thomas Creech, 1697), Astronomica IV.20 (Creech, 'Of Aquarius')
Julius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.16.2
Julius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.29.4
The fate the classical texts predicted
Firmicus Maternus and his contemporaries did not write character sketches. They predicted outcomes, and this is what they predicted for Aquarius. Every one of these has been dropped — across the whole corpus, no modern source repeats a single one.
- a short lifeJulius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.16.2
- a violent deathJulius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.29.1
The work
Occupations are the one part of this tradition that demonstrably reaches the present. Character claims mostly do not, and physiognomy does not at all — but the trades the classical texts assigned to Aquarius are still being assigned to it.
engineering and technology — attested in antiquity and repeated today.
- engineering and technologyattested antiquity → present5 of 12 core sourcesMarcus Manilius (trans. Thomas Creech, 1697), Astronomica IV.20 (Creech, 'Of Aquarius') · Alan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.38-39 · Sepharial (Walter Gorn Old), p.74 · The AstroTwins (Astrostyle)
- humanitarian workmodern only · no pre-1929 source1 of 12 core sourcesHoroscope.com editorial staff · Acharya Rajesh Gupta, DuAstro
- research and the sciences19th c. only · no modern source2 of 12 core sourcesAlan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.38-39 · Sepharial (Walter Gorn Old), p.74
- buildingantiquity only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesMarcus Manilius (trans. Thomas Creech, 1697), Astronomica IV.20 (Creech, 'Of Aquarius')
- trade and brokerage19th c. only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesSepharial (Walter Gorn Old), p.74
- founding a business19th c. only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesSepharial (Walter Gorn Old), p.74
- medicine and healingantiquity only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesJulius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.29.11
- metalworkantiquity only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesJulius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.16.3
- soldieringantiquity only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesJulius Firmicus Maternus, Mathesis VIII.16.1
- music19th c. only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesAlan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.38-39
- art and design19th c. only · no modern source1 of 12 core sourcesAlan Leo (William Frederick Allan, 1860-1917), p.38-39
Rulership
The classical scheme gave every sign one of the seven visible planets. The outer planets were discovered between 1781 and 1930 and reassigned later, so where a sign has two rulers, both are real claims from different centuries. Neither is the correction of the other.
Correspondences
Grouped by what kind of claim each is. Element and modality are agreed by every source in every century; the lucky numbers are agreed by almost nobody. Both appear on every astrology site in the same table, in the same type, which is how one borrows the other’s authority.
structural
Agreed by every source in every century.
dignity
Classical doctrine. Stable, but the outer planets are a modern addition.
mythic
The sign's image. Phrasings vary; the figure does not.
body
Melothesia — the sign's part of the body. Ancient, and not medical.
- body part
- ankles
- calves
- circulatory system
- forearms
- Shins
- legs
- Legs
- first attested 19th c. · no ancient source2 of 12 core sources
accretion
Modern accretion. Sources rarely agree with each other.
- day
- Thursday
contested Friday — one source disagrees.
- modern only · no pre-1929 source2 supporting sources · none in the core panel
The body the old books describe
William Lilly, Raphael and Sepharial all told you what a Aquarius looked like. Modern astrology dropped this entirely: across the whole corpus, not one physical description is repeated by a contemporary source. It is reproduced here as what those writers said, in the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries, and for no other reason.
- stature
- middle 2short 1tall 1
- build
- strong 3well-proportioned 3stout 2square 1
- hair colour
- fair 2dark 1variable 1
- eye colour
- blue 1dark 1
- complexion
- fair 2ruddy 2
- face shape
- long 3
- forehead
- clear 1
- chin
- well-developed 1
- aspect
- handsome 4
- features
- straight 1
2 further descriptions from these authors classifies people by ethnic type. It is recorded in our data with its source and page, and is not reproduced here.